Ireland Crime

Supreme Court judgment rejecting Brady's final appeal, confirming the 2020 jury conviction and life sentence with 40-year minimum term.

Supreme Court determination refusing leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision on the capital murder and robbery convictions. The article gives the background of the trial and appeal but does not say what the Supreme Court will do next.

The Court of Appeal dismissed all of Brady's grounds of appeal after a seven-day hearing in October 2023, so he remains in prison serving his minimum 40-year life sentence.

Adds that the Court of Appeal upheld the murder conviction on 11 July 2024 and dismissed all grounds of appeal, including the Covid-19 trial argument. Adds Brady's parole eligibility date and that he is awaiting sentencing for perverting the course of justice before the Special Criminal Court.

Article reports the Court of Appeal's judgment dismissing Brady's appeal against his murder conviction, which was returned in August 2020. It also states he was sentenced to 14 years for robbery, concurrent with the life sentence.

Reports that Aaron Brady's appeal has failed and that he will serve a minimum of 40 years. The article text is search-widget template code, so the only usable content is the headline.

The Court of Appeal rejected all grounds of appeal against Brady's conviction, which was returned in August 2020 after a trial that is described as the longest murder case in Irish legal history.

Adds that on 11 July 2024 the Court of Appeal dismissed all grounds of Brady's appeal against conviction, including the video-link interruption ground, after a seven-day hearing in October 2023 and a 363-page judgment.

Covers the final day of the Court of Appeal hearing, in which the defence raised a juror-visit ground of appeal and the court reserved judgment. Adds details of the defence and prosecution arguments and the jury minder evidence.

Reports the Court of Appeal hearing on Brady's appeal against his murder conviction, including the late disclosure of a steroids report, the DPP's reply, and the defence's claim that the witness's conduct was improper. Adds the sentence of 14 years for robbery and the 11-1 jury verdict.

Reports the fourth day of the Court of Appeal hearing. Defence counsel argue the trial was fundamentally flawed after witness Molly Staunton was interrupted by an unseen man. The DPP says the hostile-witness decision was for the trial judge. The appeal continues before Mr Justice John Edwards.

Reports the fourth day of Brady's Court of Appeal hearing: his counsel argue that a witness, Molly Staunton, was interrupted by an unseen man during her evidence, that the trial court wrongly refused a defence application to discharge the jury, and that she should not have been declared hostile. The article also restates the background of the conviction and sentence.

Reports the second day of the Court of Appeal hearing on Brady's appeal against his murder conviction, including the grounds argued about late disclosure of documents and letters of scope and the prosecution's response. Adds that the appeal continues the next day before Mr Justice John Edwards, and that a complaint about witness Molly Staunton's video-link testimony is expected.

Reports on the third day of Brady's six-day Court of Appeal hearing. Defence counsel Michael O'Higgins SC argued that the trial judge wrongly excluded a covert recording of US Special Agent Matt Katske speaking to Suspect A at Belfast Airport in July 2017. The trial judge had refused to let the tape be played to the jury. The article also says the appeal continues on Monday and that a complaint about witness Molly Staunton's video-link testimony is expected.

Third day of the Court of Appeal hearing. The defence argues that the trial judge wrongly excluded a covert recording of US special agent Matt Katske and Suspect A, and the DPP says the tape was not relevant. The appeal continues the following Monday.

Reports the second day of Brady's six-day Court of Appeal hearing, in which his defence argues late disclosure and limits on US agents' evidence. Brady is serving a life sentence with a 40-year minimum; the appeal is expected to continue the next day with a complaint about a video-link witness.

Reports the second day of Brady's six-day Court of Appeal hearing, in which the defence argued late disclosure of documents about the US special agents' evidence rendered the trial unfair. The prosecution replied that the letters of scope were disclosed late in May 2020.

Reports an appeal hearing in which it was argued that a jury should not have determined Brady's guilt or innocence during lockdown. The article body is empty, so the only source is the headline.

Reports the Court of Appeal hearing of Aaron Brady's challenge to his 2020 murder conviction. Adds the grounds of appeal (Covid-era trial and a jury burden, cross-examination of his former solicitor), the prosecution's response, the 122-day trial length and the appeal's scheduled continuation.

Reports the start of Brady's appeal against his murder conviction at the Court of Appeal, a six-day hearing focused on the Covid-era trial, with the appeal expected to concentrate on two witnesses who gave evidence by video link from New York.

Reports the first day of Brady's Court of Appeal hearing against his murder conviction, in which his lawyers argue the trial should have been discharged because of Covid-19. The DPP opposes the appeal, and no ruling is reported.